The New York Times has published an amazing interactive look at a conceptual project for ground zero, developed by well-known architechts unsatisfied with the city's efforts so far. This article describes the project illustrated by the flash presentation (click image).
The architects criticize the process put in place to develop the new ground zero plan, saying that it's too bureaucratic and doesn't involve architects at the fundamental stages where they really need to be involved. They came up with the plan as a hypothetical scenario just to see what they could do together. It involves a memorial at the actual site, two huge twisting towers adjacent, a number of museums, and the conversion of a huge length of West St. into a long park and pedestrian mall.
This plan sounds orders of magnitude better to me than any I've seen yet. I'm sure the entire plan would never get made, for political and other reasons, but maybe the city will be smart enough to at least consider some of the ideas... particularly the towers. :)
This was a very interesting article and Flash presentation. I like the new twisted towers, but the crumpled office buildings are pretty creepy. Thanks for linking to this, else I wouldn't have otherwise read it.
I think the towers and the West St. park are the best ideas. We definitely need more pedestrian space in the biggest American cities — more places one can just ride the subway to, walk around, hang out, drink coffee, and feel the bustle... :)
Posted by: Trevor Hill at September 15, 2002 01:55 PM
Posted by: M Sinclair Stevens at September 14, 2002 08:34 PM