December 03, 2002
Societal Intelligence and Quantum Leaps

This weekend I happened to go check out a Japanese bookstore and pick up some calligraphy gear. I love calligraphy — it has a life to it that really reminds you how much meaning is in the information we write down...

Periodically I'm reminded in these moments of a theory I have about human society, intelligence, tools, and their interaction.

Fundamentally as we know from our experience with computers, there are three important elements to processing information: processing power, information storage (memory), and communication (protocols). Each of these requires hardware to implement it, and organization or software to keep it running correctly, and working together with the other components.

We can view the human race and it's leaps forward in these terms as well. The advent of human intelligence was a revolution in processing power. This allowed us to figure out many new things, but there were of course limits. Our discovery of language was a second revolution, this time of communication, allowing us to pool our processing power to achieve even more than before. It also effectively increased our memory because we could share information stored in the memories of various people.

Writing was really the third major revolution in our history, as it vastly increased our capacity for information storage and recall, or our collective memory. Various innovations in filing, printing, etc, served to further increase the utility of this information storage system.

Now, computers are allowing us to simultaneously stretch all three of these capabilities. Currently, processing power is increasing steadily, but we are really experiencing revolutionary new capabilities due to vast increases in our memory and communication capacities. Hard drives of 100 Gigs and more will soon allow us to carry with us vast libraries of not only documents and music, but video. Important communication hubs are forming in the great cities of the world, wherein anyone can stop in at a café and communicate with people all over the planet. And the pipes continue to get fatter to accomodate our huge hard-drives.

But really, why is all this revolutionary? Because it allows us to process vastly more information than we ever could do alone. It allows us to recall and use vastly more information than we ever could do alone... In fact, I believe that the faster we get used to the idea that our human capacities are limited, that we must depend on computers to reach our full potential, the better we will be prepared for the future. Our ability to manipulate massive stores of information effectively is becoming much much more important than what we know, or can do, as an individual.

These are all reasons why I believe there is an ancillary social revolution in the works. When people finally begin to realize what I'm talking about here, there will be a massive change in the way we approach education. Rather than teaching a wide variety of facts, trying to create well-rounded individuals, we will finally realize that we should just give students the tools they need to do this themselves, saving them years of off-topic memorization, and then move on to specifics quickly. We may also allow them to return to school to change fields later, without stigma or unnecessary difficulty.

Hmmm. ;)

Posted by Trevor Hill at December 03, 2002 05:38 PM

Just some thoughts on the advent of communication some more reason to think that it was a rather fine idea of our hairy ancestors. It may be the first example of an artificial influence over evolution and natural selection (if you put faith in such theories, which I do, and if you don't then you probably won't want to bother reading this). Prior to communication behavior and survival were most likely primarily based off of instincts, determined by genetics. Individuals who, through normal genetic mutation, developed with instincts that were mal-suited for their local environment were unlikely to survive long much less reproduce, thereby making instinctual characteristics a very strong selection force. Experiences and the memory of, would also affect survivability and reproductive potential, however depending on the basic change in instinctual behavior, an individual may or may not have a chance to utilize gained experience. You only get one chance to show that you know to run away or elude a predator. However with the advent of communication and thereby education this would have likely changed.

The sharing of information could allow the development of critical behavioral patterns rather than having instincs and experience as the sole sources. For instance, dogs know instinctually how to swim. If they didn't chances are they wouldn't be around too long, especially with owners who liket to play fetch near ponds. If a dog doesn't instinctually know how to swim, and if dogs could communicate at some level of complexity, one dog may be able to tell the other what the basics of swimming are. Humans have taught dogs to do some silly stuff, which further suggests that communication can significantly alter the array of behavioral patterns available to an animal (that animal includes us Hsapes). Dogs have the requisite processing power and memory, but seem to lack the communicative complexity that we have attained. Also, communication in the direction of high to low complexity seems more effective than from low to high. One might think that having a more highly developed ability to communicate, more basic communication strategies would then appear simplistic. But I don't know too much about that.

Well thats my comment, any more and it would likely stagger its way out of the realm of comment and into that of rambling or rant.

Posted by: mstadler at December 6, 2002 02:04 AM

Mmmm. It actually makes me wonder -- what would have happened if language were impossible for some reason? I guess as long as there is a medium between us, we could have developed a language with sonar or blinking lights or something totally unimaginable...

But maybe we would rather have developed the ability to pass on memories to our offspring... I've heard that elephants actually do this, but I've never looked into it. Do you know of any examples of this happening, or how it might be possible? All this talk has made me curious... ;)

BTW, are you still in Japan? How is everything going over there?

Posted by: Trevor Hill at December 7, 2002 12:30 AM